nanog mailing list archives
Re: smurf amp nets
From: Michael Dillon <michael () memra com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 23:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Jon Lewis wrote:
I should probably have trimmed all nets responding with fewer than 2 IPs since even a cisco with "no ip directed-broadcast" will generally respond with a source ip of the interface on which the echo request arrived.
Exactly! And folks who are supernetting adjacent /24s into a single /23 could be using the .255 address as a host address.
BTW...I have a theory for a way to get all or most of the big smurf amp networks fixed real fast...but doing it would probably get me in big trouble.
Just find the amplifier nets and post their addresses here. Let someone else get in big trouble. The net result will be roughly the same. You do realize that 3l33t KrAkKeR d00dz monitor this list, don't you? -- Michael Dillon - Internet & ISP Consulting Memra Communications Inc. - E-mail: michael () memra com http://www.memra.com - *check out the new name & new website*
Current thread:
- smurf amp nets Jon Lewis (Jun 12)
- Re: smurf amp nets Michael Dillon (Jun 12)
- Re: smurf amp nets Jon Lewis (Jun 12)
- Re: smurf amp nets Michael Dillon (Jun 13)
- Re: smurf amp nets Jared Mauch (Jun 13)
- Re: smurf amp nets Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 13)
- Re: smurf amp nets Karl Denninger (Jun 13)
- Re: smurf amp nets ken emery (Jun 13)
- Re: smurf amp nets Craig A. Huegen (Jun 13)
- Re: smurf amp nets Jon Lewis (Jun 12)
- Re: smurf amp nets Craig A. Huegen (Jun 13)
- Re: smurf amp nets Michael Shields (Jun 13)
- Re: smurf amp nets Michael Dillon (Jun 12)
- Re: smurf amp nets Oystein Homelien (Jun 14)
- Re: smurf amp nets Eric McClelland (Jun 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: smurf amp nets Oystein Homelien (Jun 15)