nanog mailing list archives
Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic
From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 11:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, May 23, 1998 at 04:50:52PM -0700, Tom Perrine wrote:Currently there are at least 60 ISPs serving the San Diego county area. There are LOTS of packets from "home" to "office" that make a round-trip via MAE-West. Some people have decided that this is silly. Even if it is "cost-effective", it *squanders* bandwidth at MAE-West that could best be used for other traffic. I wonder how much bandwidth at the MAEs could be saved if more areas built local low-cost NAPs just for local traffice exchanges?I think there's a lot of merit to this proposal. i
Then check out the San Diego NAP.... --bill
Current thread:
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Steve Sobol (Jun 01)
- Message not available
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 01)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Steve Sobol (Jun 03)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 01)
- Message not available
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic bmanning (Jun 01)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Dax Kelson (Jun 03)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Dax Kelson (Jun 03)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic bmanning (Jun 02)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Tracie Monk (Jun 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Bill Woodcock (Jun 01)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Sean Donelan (Jun 03)