nanog mailing list archives
Re: PPP over Ethernet?
From: Vijay Gill <wrath () cs umbc edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 07:43:42 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 3 Jun 1998 dirk () power net wrote:
could you explain how ppp encapsulating (etherh+payload) reduces the overhead?Who says you need the etherheader? Its not ethernet, its a point to point connection in this setup.
If you are using ethernet cards to talk to each other, it _is_ ethernet. The bits will be placed on the wire, the framing, CSMA/CD algorithm etc, will all be done in accordance with the 802.3 spec. The physical wire will be carrying the bits in 802.3 format, including the preamble, starting frame delimiter, MAC destination addrress and MAC source address, since the cards don't know how to use any other method of framing and sending the data. -vijay
Current thread:
- PPP over Ethernet? Zachary DeAquila (Jun 03)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? Perry E. Metzger (Jun 03)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? dirk (Jun 03)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? Bradley Reynolds (Jun 03)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? dirk (Jun 03)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? Vijay Gill (Jun 04)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? Greg Simpson (Jun 03)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? dirk (Jun 03)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? NetSurfer (Jun 04)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jun 04)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? Phillip Vandry (Jun 04)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? Dave Siegel (Jun 05)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jun 04)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jun 05)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? Perry E. Metzger (Jun 03)
- Re: PPP over Ethernet? Scott Brim (Jun 04)