nanog mailing list archives

Re: Warrants for email and backup tapes


From: Karl Denninger <karl () mcs net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 19:56:43 -0500

On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 10:24:31PM +0000, William Allen Simpson wrote:
Our ISP was just served a warrant (out of California) demanding our
dialup logs and email backup tapes.  So far, the warrant is probably
invalid, as it mis-named the company.  And as far as we can tell, we are
not being charged with anything -- or at least we have not been told so.
We only have our usual contracts attorney, and he seems a bit out of his
depth.

This is pretty invasive to our customers.  We'll have a dickens of a
time complying, as we don't back up client email, except at odd
intervals backing up entire systems.  And we only keep dialing logs
around for a few months at a time, since we don't use them for billing.

Is anyone else having this experience?  If so, what have you done?

WSimpson () UMich edu
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32

Talk to a lawyer who understands this.

IN GENERAL - a state-based subpoena out of jurisdiction does not have to be
complied with.  HOWEVER, the issuer can then turn around and get it served 
out of your state (if they want to).

Its a pain in the ass for them to do this, but they certainly CAN.

If you have what's in the subpoena, and the subpoena is valid, you either
comply or risk a contempt citation from the judge who signed it.  You don't
have to produce what you don't have, obviously (you can't invent things that
don't exist!)

You CAN fight a subpoena (and you might even be able to get it quashed).
You really need a good attorney to look this situation over.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl () MCS Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/          | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
                             | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax:   [+1 312 803-4929]     | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost


Current thread: