nanog mailing list archives
Re: IS-IS or OSPF as BGP IGP
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 18:50:28 -0400
My recommendation is not to redistribute BGP into any IGP at all. I personally consider that to be a very dangerous thing to do. - paul At 06:26 PM 7/17/98 -0400, Martin, Christian wrote:
All, Does anyone have any information on redistributing BGP traffic into OSPF versus ISIS? What about just carrying IBGP sessions? My OSPF database is growing, and I'd rather not carry LSAs with BGP routes as well as private routes, etc. Too messy. By introducing ISIS and using it only as a BGP IGP, what can I expect? Experiences with Cisco gear preffered. -Christian
Current thread:
- IS-IS or OSPF as BGP IGP Martin, Christian (Jul 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IS-IS or OSPF as BGP IGP Paul Ferguson (Jul 17)
- Re: IS-IS or OSPF as BGP IGP Alex P. Rudnev (Jul 19)
- Re: IS-IS or OSPF as BGP IGP Leigh Porter (Jul 27)