nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access
From: Geoff White <geoffw () precipice v-site net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 22:09:40 -0800 (PST)
On Sat, 24 Jan 1998, Sharif Torpis wrote:
Not unless they implemented this in the last 12 weeks or so. You may be thinking of U.S. West. Or maybe I just got lucky.
we tried this in December and it was a no go. basically they say that they are running out of pairs for that purpose.
Geoff White wrote:On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, ^Faust^ wrote:Tell him to order a 2-wire alarm circuit and slap a Tut 12000 (or your favorite product) on each end. Yes, I've done it. And yes, it was in P*B territory.Their wise to that now :) There seems to be a moratorium on "alarm circuits"
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access ^Faust^ (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Geoff White (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Greg Simpson (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access ^Faust^ (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Nathan Stratton (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Geoff White (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Dalvenjah FoxFire (Jan 23)
- RE: Microsoft offering xDSL access David Lemson (Jan 26)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Sharif Torpis (Jan 24)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Geoff White (Jan 24)
- Re: [nanog] Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Stephen Balbach (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Pete Ashdown (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access HawkeWerks Multimedia (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 23)
- RE: Microsoft offering xDSL access David Lemson (Jan 26)