nanog mailing list archives
Open Standards vs IOPS etc [was Re: BGP community based IP filtering]
From: Chris Layton <cll () mecca servint com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 06:07:27 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Dorian R. Kim wrote:
But isn't what you described implementation details? I'm not sure if I see a standard to track in this... Perhaps a better venue to track something like this is an IEPG/RIPE/IOPS/etc.
Since you suggest IOPS as a body to track this issue, what do people think about IOPS as a pseudo-standards group. This also came up at the December IETF when Curtis suggested that draft-berkowitz-multirqmt document would not be necessary since IOPS had a draft on the same subject. The IDR WG seemed very sceptical of having a small closed body fill that role. How do people see IOPS meshing with NANOG and the operational side of IETF? thanks, -chris
Current thread:
- BGP community based IP filtering Matt Ryan (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Jerry Scharf (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Alan Hannan (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Dorian R. Kim (Jan 15)
- Open Standards vs IOPS etc [was Re: BGP community based IP filtering] Chris Layton (Jan 16)
- Re: Open Standards vs IOPS etc [was Re: BGP community based IP filtering] Dorian R. Kim (Jan 16)
- Re: Open Standards vs IOPS etc [was Re: BGP community based IP filtering] Howard C. Berkowitz (Jan 16)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Dorian R. Kim (Jan 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Open Standards vs IOPS etc [was Re: BGP community based IP filtering] Paul Ferguson (Jan 16)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Alan Hannan (Jan 16)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Dorian R. Kim (Jan 15)
- Is Whois.ra.net Server process down ???? Network Operations Center (Jan 16)
- Re: Is Whois.ra.net Server process down ???? John Hawkinson (Jan 16)
- Re: Is Whois.ra.net Server process down ???? Abha Ahuja (Jan 16)