nanog mailing list archives

Re: Smurfing


From: ken emery <ken () cnet com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 16:26:56 -0800 (PST)

On Fri, 13 Feb 1998, Dean Anderson wrote:

At 5:52 PM -0500 2/13/98, Randy Bush wrote:
 o All router administrators on the immediately reachable
   Internet needs to turn off directed broadcasts on their router
   interfaces.  It's conceivable that "a significant portion of
   all" would do as well, but the magnitude of this problem
   boggles the mind.  First of all, we'd need to distribute the
   appropriate amount of clue to all the corners of the net where
   this needs to happen.  Maybe, just maybe, we'll get there
   sometime (I'm an optimist!).

why should this not have become the default mode for all vendor diustributed
router code?

Because routers used by regular companies on their intranets generally need
to propogate directed broadcasts so that protocols and software that use
directed broadcasts in a subnetted environment will work properly. Its only
at the borders of other companies (such as ISP's) that directed broadcasts
have to be turned off.
 
If the ICMP packet is permitted in to the internal network then it 
doesn't matter where the network is, only that it have sufficient 
bandwidth to generate the necessary traffic out to the border (from 
the smurfer's POV).  This is why it needs to be turned off on all 
LAN segments (assuming it isn't used for other things).

Even ISP's that use things like HPOV SNMP host discovery internally need to
permit internal directed broadcasts.  But they shouldn't go outside your
network, and you probably don't want them coming in from the outside to
your internal network.
 
How often is SNMP host discovery done?  Can't HPOV be directed to just 
discover on a specific network?

bye,
ken emery



Current thread: