nanog mailing list archives
Re: Broken domain statistics...
From: "Michael K. Sanders" <msanders () aros net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 18:42:49 -0700
In message <19980211132424.19891 () dragonlair dal net>, Dalvenjah FoxFire writes:
And if it is, it means that 17% of the folks on the internet are paying for domains that don't work. Either that, or something else is broken.
An alternate interpretation might be that 17% (or some portion thereof) of the domains in .COM are held by domain speculators who have no intention of paying for them and can't be bothered to provide DNS for them.
I'm posting here because I feel it is an operational issue; that, plus I feel there're more folks here who can and will hammer at InterNIC to start doing something to enforce their policies that require real, authoritative nameservers.
If nothing else, it might deter casual domain speculators. God forbid they actually have to configure something before they can register a domain... No doubt someone would just automate the process, though.
Current thread:
- Broken domain statistics... Dalvenjah FoxFire (Feb 11)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... Michael K. Sanders (Feb 11)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... Lisa Lorenzin (Feb 12)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... Dan Haskovec (Feb 12)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... dirk (Feb 12)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... Randy Bush (Feb 12)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... Phillip Vandry (Feb 12)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... J.D. Falk (Feb 12)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... John-David Childs (Feb 12)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... Damien O'Rourke (Feb 12)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... NetSurfer (Feb 12)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... Jon Lewis (Feb 12)
- Re: Broken domain statistics... Michael K. Sanders (Feb 11)