nanog mailing list archives
Re: MTU of the Internet?
From: Tony Li <tli () juniper net>
Date: 05 Feb 1998 00:51:49 -0800
perry () piermont com (Perry E. Metzger) writes:
This will effectively triple the number of packets that routers have to do processing on, that's why.
The intent is right, but the result here is wrong. Unfortunately, 1500 byte packets are rare. About 6.9% of the traffic (by packet). Yes, it would triple that fragment of the traffic. However, that would not affect the other (much more common) packet sizes in the distribution. If you wanna worry about the number of packets in the net, worry about the 40 byte packets. Dem's da killas. ;-) Tony
Current thread:
- Re: MTU of the Internet?, (continued)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Joseph Malcolm (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Fletcher E Kittredge (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Marc Slemko (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Alex Bligh (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Alex P. Rudnev (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Marc Slemko (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Eric Osborne (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Tony Li (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jim Dixon (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Eric Osborne (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Frank Kastenholz (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Ron Fitzherbert (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Scott Whyte (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Steve Carter (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 05)