nanog mailing list archives
Re: ** Forged spamming going on
From: Rich Sena <ras () poppa clubrich tiac net>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 19:27:39 -0500 (EST)
Wow must've fat-fingered the procmail entry... On Wed, 23 Dec 1998, Dean Anderson wrote:
I haven't seen any change in spam volume. So I think it has been ineffective at achieving its goals.
Hey yo-yo - why don't you subscribe to the RBL - and see if SPAM volumes polluting your and your customers' mailboxen increases or decreases - how can you say what the RBL does or does not do - YOU DON'T USE IT SKIPPY. -- I am nothing if not net-Q! - ras () poppa clubrich tiac net
Current thread:
- Re: ** Forged spamming going on, (continued)
- Re: ** Forged spamming going on George Herbert (Dec 22)
- Re: ** Forged spamming going on Dean Anderson (Dec 22)
- Re: ** Forged spamming going on Derek Balling (Dec 22)
- Pauls RBL Campaign of Terror Christopher E. Brown (Dec 23)
- Re: ** Forged spamming going on Rich Sena (Dec 23)
- RE: ** Forged spamming going on James D. Wilson (Dec 23)
- Re: ** Forged spamming going on William Allen Simpson (Dec 23)
- Re: ** Forged spamming going on Paul Vixie (Dec 23)
- Re: ** Forged spamming going on Dean Anderson (Dec 23)
- Re: ** Forged spamming going on Patrick Greenwell (Dec 23)
- Re: ** Forged spamming going on Rich Sena (Dec 23)
- Re: ** Forged spamming going on Dean Anderson (Dec 23)