nanog mailing list archives
Windows TweakDUN issue..
From: bcurnow <bcurnow () sonnet com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 19:20:19 -0800 (PST)
In regards to the topic, is there a _technical_ discussion, perhaps written by someone here, on what is broken in Win9x that makes these kinds of software useful? I find it disturbing to read that MS makes 576 the default in 98, while still seeming to produce an ack for every packet on TCP. I think being able to single handedly reduce the number of packets sent by 25% should have been a high priority for them. Instead they choose to triple it. Or am I in need of a higher RFC exposure? ----------------- Brian Curnow ----------------
Current thread:
- Windows TweakDUN issue.. bcurnow (Dec 01)