nanog mailing list archives
Re: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface?
From: Tony Li <tli () juniper net>
Date: 02 Aug 1998 23:47:12 -0700
I find in an article, and it says: in 1995,1996 most nationalwide ISP face the demand of higher bandwidth than T3, and at that time the only avalible high bandwidth interface in router in ATM port(say 155M), then this makes many of them choose ATM as their backbone tech. Later, Giga router with POS(Packet over SONET/SDH) 155M(or higher) interface comes out, then the situation is changed. Then my question is: why 155M ATM interface is easier to make than 155M POS interface? Although the net capacity of 155M ATM is less than 155m POS, their capacity for IP packet is really close. I think its nearly the same challenge to pump up a 155M ATM pipe as a 155M POS pipe with IP packet for a router.
The ATM interface is actually harder to make than a POS interface because you have to include the segmentation and reassembly (SAR) functionality in the hardware. Also, the software gets a lot more complicated. Why then did ATM appear first? There was a great deal of publicity given to it. The vision was that it was going to be the 'media' of the future and the hype ran all out of proportion with reality. It took quite a while for the hype to give way, and for engineering and economic realities to truly settle in. And as can be seen from recent announcements, that process is not yet complete. One other fallacy here: ATM and POS do not provide the same effective bandwidth when used as an IP transport. Due to the high encapsulation overhead and the sizing overhead of fitting packets into cells, ATM has proven to be about 20% less efficient at carrying packets than SONET. While this is probably not an issue in a campus or within a building, the implications for long lines is enormous. Tony
Current thread:
- Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Yu Ning (Aug 02)
- Re: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Tony Li (Aug 03)
- Re: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? George Janosik (Aug 03)
- Re: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Alan Hannan (Aug 03)
- RE: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Christian Kuhtz (Aug 03)
- RE: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? brad (Aug 03)
- RE: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Christian Kuhtz (Aug 03)
- RE: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Christian Kuhtz (Aug 03)
- Re: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Tony Li (Aug 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Sean Donelan (Aug 03)
- Re: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Tony Li (Aug 03)
- RE: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Christian Kuhtz (Aug 03)
- RE: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? George Janosik (Aug 03)
- Re: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Michael Dillon (Aug 03)
- RE: Q:Why router with ATM interface comes out earlier than pure SONET interface? Christian Kuhtz (Aug 03)