nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG Channel Archives and Editorializing
From: Dean Robb <pceasy () norfolk infi net>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 10:26:03 -0400
At 20:38 8/5/98 -0400, you wrote:
A request came in today to remove a post that listed a number of hosts open for relaying. The individual asked me to remove the message so as to minimize the damage it causes the owners of the listed relays, including himself. Since these are generated from the flat archives at Merit, I'm loath to start editorializing. What do folks think? Should we edit the archives to remove "dangerous" information, or let them stand on their merits (no pun intended) and let the roaches scatter in the light?
I vote to let them stand. The person(s) who feel they are slighted or in danger from a public list (of information that is, after all, not all that hard to obtain independently) needs only to correct the problem to remove the danger.
Respond privately unless you absolutely feel a need to start a discussion on it. I'll post the decision I come to on the list.
I think it's an area deserving of public discussion. There are numerous "open relay" lists around, from folks genuinely trying to be helpful to spammers sharing info, so removal from the archives is not really going to do much for the issue one way or another. However, the question is begged: "Should information on potential network abuse points be shared and public or not?" Wabbit season!..duck season!..wabbit season!..duck season!..SPAMMER SEASON! Dean Robb PC-EASY computer services (757) 495-EASY [3279]
Current thread:
- NANOG Channel Archives and Editorializing Eric Germann (Aug 05)
- Re: NANOG Channel Archives and Editorializing Dean Robb (Aug 06)
- Re: NANOG Channel Archives and Editorializing Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Aug 06)
- Re: NANOG Channel Archives and Editorializing Roeland M.J. Meyer (Aug 06)
- Re: NANOG Channel Archives and Editorializing Dean Robb (Aug 07)
- RE: NANOG Channel Archives and Editorializing Christian Kuhtz (Aug 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NANOG Channel Archives and Editorializing Richard Thomas (Aug 06)
- Re: NANOG Channel Archives and Editorializing Dean Robb (Aug 06)