nanog mailing list archives
Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI)
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () alink net>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 16:36:02 -0700
Richard Irving wrote:
What about netflow ? Vadim Antonov wrote:It is not technically feasible.
You can do traffic analysis based on statistical sampling. Good luck doing _billing_ based on statistics. In any case, nobody was able to connect backbone flow traces for any significant amount of time. A typical Internet load on OC-3 would produce about 7000 fps, or 500 mil flows per day. Now, crunching that data to generate bills is going to be fun. I'm not saying this is impossible, but the infrastructure for doing so is going to cost at least an order of magnitude more than the non-accounting backbone. --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Chris A. Icide (Aug 22)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Vadim Antonov (Aug 25)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Perry E. Metzger (Aug 25)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Richard Irving (Aug 25)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Vadim Antonov (Aug 25)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Vadim Antonov (Aug 25)