nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN/GTEI
From: Paul Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: 24 Aug 1998 21:42:50 -0700
Exodus GTEI/BBN The real question is who will pull out first. I do not agree with GTEI/BBN's tactics, but unfortunately they need to do what they need to do.
What I think will happen is that Exodus/GTEI will revert to public peering and this whole thing will just blow over. Neither network would expect to win anything by either refusing to peer at all, or demanding private peering, or demanding a transit relationship. In other words this particular brew-ha-ha is not going to set any precedents. -- Paul Vixie La Honda, CA "Many NANOG members have been around <paul () vix com> longer than most." --Jim Fleming pacbell!vixie!paul (An H.323 GateKeeper for the IPv8 Network)
Current thread:
- Re: BBN/GTEI, (continued)
- Re: BBN/GTEI steve (Aug 28)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Tuomas Toivonen (Aug 31)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Mike Leber (Aug 21)
- Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement John Curran (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Adrian Chadd (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Patrick Greenwell (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Paul Vixie (Aug 24)
- Re: BBN/GTEI steve (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Paul A Vixie (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI alex (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Kevin Oberman (Aug 25)
- RE: BBN/GTEI Charles Sprickman (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI steve (Aug 25)