nanog mailing list archives

Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement


From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick () namesecure com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 13:49:04 -0700 (PDT)

On Mon, 24 Aug 1998, John Curran wrote:

At 12:12 PM 08/24/1998 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
...
To some extent that's true.  However, as a counter-point, consider such
sites as sunsite, wustl, smc.vnet.net, etc.  I doubt those sites would
continue to exist in a solely bandwidth sensitive pay-as-you-go world.
I think they count on flat rate connectivity to be able to continue
to exist.  I don't think the elimination of those sites (and many others
like them) would benefit the net.  Do you?

I'm not certain that they represent a true public service, as opposed
to simply interesting content.  Interesting content can probably pay its 
own way, even at retail prices.   For example, the incremental cost to 
send 10MB of data is only about 50 cents using normal retail rates [1].
Are you saying that whatever you're downloading isn't worth paying that?
(or watching the appropriate number of web ads, as I currently do to 
download palm pilot apps, pc freeware, and today's weather gif?)

Are you saying that someone should be forced to pay for the privilege of 
offering something for free to your customers? Things that your customers,
who I number among are requesting?

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell                                        (800) 299-1288 v
                           Systems Administrator         (925) 377-1212 v
                                 NameSecure              (925) 377-1414 f    
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/




Current thread: