nanog mailing list archives
BBN Peering issues
From: cheops POP <giza () cheops mv com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 08:07:22 -0400
If your traffic is largely based on "client" side applications then guess what, your gonna have a lot of in-bound traffic. This is like AT&T whining about MCI clients calling their moms who have AT&T long distance and not collecting on that usage! If your business model doesn't account for such asymetrical behaviour what are ya gonna do?, ask mom for a charge on her incoming calls?) It looks to me like someone ought to be looking at what is good for the customer and what makes good business sense even though the two hardly ever merge.=) -pete Peter E. Giza Black Pearl Software & Consulting Inc. www.blackpearl.net 603.883.9774
Attachment:
Peter E. Giza.vcf
Description:
Current thread:
- re: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- re: BBN Peering issues Gordon Cook (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Lawrence A. Deleski (Aug 17)
- re: BBN Peering issues Jerry Scharf (Aug 17)
- re: BBN Peering issues Gordon Cook (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 18)
- RE: BBN Peering issues cheops POP (Aug 18)
- RE: BBN Peering issues cheops POP (Aug 19)
- re: BBN Peering issues Gordon Cook (Aug 17)
- re: BBN Peering issues Jerry Scharf (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Alex Bligh (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 17)
- BBN Peering issues cheops POP (Aug 18)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Bradley Reynolds (Aug 18)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Lawrence A. Deleski (Aug 18)
- RE: BBN Peering issues Martin, Christian (Aug 18)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean Donelan (Aug 22)