nanog mailing list archives
Extending a MAE connection ...
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 22:29:31 -0400 (EDT)
Here is a question.. a strange one, no less. Is it feasible to do this: WASHINGTON DC NEW YORK CITY | B R I D G E | MAE -- 100 Mb/s -- | Cisco | -DS3- | Cisco | -- FDDI or -- (multiple East FDDI | 4700M | | 4700M | 100Base T peers) giga Switch Why? here's why. Several folks in the same building in NYC want to connect to MAE-East. But, we all don't want T1's or 10 Meg HLI to MAE-East, but DS3. So, this allows us all to connect to the MAE, peer directly with others without an intermediary ASN, and we can split the cost of the routers and the DS3. I know (at least, I can't think of any reason it can't be done) that is can be done. The unanswered questions are: 1) Will MFS allow us to connect multiple Peers on the same FDDI port (from thier webpage, it looks like it, but I am not sure). 2) Is there any technical reason that the above is bad? 3) Because we do it the way shown above, does that make us look less attractive (politically) ? Thanks for any input on this. If there is anything I am missing, please slap me. Thanks.
Current thread:
- Extending a MAE connection ... Alex Rubenstein (Sep 23)
- Re: Extending a MAE connection ... Tony Li (Sep 23)
- Re: Extending a MAE connection ... bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Extending a MAE connection ... Avi Freedman (Sep 24)
- Re: Extending a MAE connection ... Erik Sherk (Sep 24)
- Re: Extending a MAE connection ... Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 24)
- Re: Extending a MAE connection ... Craig A. Huegen (Sep 24)
- Re: Extending a MAE connection ... Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 24)
- Re: Extending a MAE connection ... Craig A. Huegen (Sep 24)
- Re: Extending a MAE connection ... Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 24)
- Re: Extending a MAE connection ... Nathan Stratton (Sep 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re[2]: Extending a MAE connection ... Rocky Rosas (Sep 24)
- Re: Extending a MAE connection ... Tony Li (Sep 23)