Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful

[NetSurfer <netsurf () pixi com>]

On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, Matt Ryan wrote:

> If people are having trouble with their mailservers dying under the spammers
> attack(!) then I would suggest they need a more scalable system.

If the spammers argue that they have a right to send a machine 4000+
messages then why is it mail bombing when someone retaliates and sends the
spammer 4000+ messages?  Do the spammers need a more scalable system?

-
James D. Wilson
netsurf () pixi com