nanog mailing list archives

Re: Possible topic?


From: Jessica Yu <jyy () ans net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 09:52:24 -0400

There is a non-trivial amount of WAN traffic flowing between ISPs' private 
interconnects.  They do not touch NAPs at all.  I wonder if this factor 
is taken into consideration when the 1/3 figure was generated.

                                                --jessica

Date:    Tue, 21 Oct 1997 17:27:42 PDT
To:      "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian () blackrose org>
cc:      "Paul G. Donner" <pdonner () cisco com>, nanog () merit edu
 
From:    Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Subject: Re: Possible topic?
 
Return-Path: owner-nanog () merit edu 
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971021184838.3188b-100000 () thorn blackrose org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender:  owner-nanog () merit edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Length: 710
 
Dorian R. Kim wrote:

On Tue, 21 Oct 1997, Paul G. Donner wrote:

At 05:58 PM 10/21/97 -0400, Dorian R. Kim wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 1997, Richard Irving wrote:


Which one:

  With about 1/3 of all global internet passing through that parking

This one?

This one.

Seems waaay too high. I don't think 1/3 all global Internet traffic passes
through _all_ of public exchanges, let alone one exchange.
 
If we're talking about WAN traffic (not all IP traffic), then
my estimate is about 70% going through an exchange point.
 
Given MAE-East's central location, 33% seems to be not that far
off the mark (definitely not orders of magnitude).  10% maybe.
 
--vadim



Current thread: