nanog mailing list archives

AGIS/Cyberpromo Article


From: Mark E Larson <markl () rust net>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 09:37:05 -0400


http://www.freep.com/browsing/internet/qagis1.htm

October 1, 1997

                  BY MIKE BRENNAN
                  Free Press Business Writer

                  A Dearborn Internet company must put the Web's
                  largest creator of electronic junk mail back on
                  line, at least for the next two weeks, a federal
                  judge ruled Tuesday.

                  But Cyber Promotions must post a $12,500 bond
                  to pay for any potential damage to Apex Global
                  Internet Services' (AGIS) computer network
                  from net users opposed to bulk electronic
                  advertising, U.S. District Judge Anita Brody said
                  in her ruling in Philadelphia.

                  Cyber Promotions had been sending daily millions
                  of unsolicited electronic ads for everything from
                  get-rich-quick schemes to sexually explicit Web
                  sites.

                  Sept. 16, AGIS pulled the plug on Cyber after
                  three AGIS central switching stations were shut
                  down by a flood of electronic signals from Web
                  surfers opposed to junk E-mail.

                  Brody ruled AGIS' contract with Cyber
                  Promotions requires a 30-day notice before
                  service could be terminated.

                  So, she said, AGIS must reinstate Cyber
                  Promotions through Oct. 16, or until the junk
                  E-mailer gets connected through another Internet
                  service provider.

                  AGIS President Phillip Lawlor said he was
                  disappointed with Brody's decision because he
                  feels she did not hear all the evidence. He
                  contends he may still disconnect Cyber
                  Promotions without notice because of the
                  electronic attacks against his network and
                  because the company also used AGIS' network to
                  counterattack its Web enemies.

                  He asked that anti-bulk E-mail forces end the
                  warfare against AGIS because of the court
                  order. "The court has spoken," Lawlor said. "We
                  need to honor our connectivity contract to Cyber
                  Promotions."

                  Lawlor said he now regrets his decision to give
                  Cyber Promotions and several other bulk
                  E-mailers -- called spammers in Net jargon -- a
                  home. But he said he took his actions to help
                  create a code of ethics for bulk E-mailers.

                  Now he would welcome federal legislation
                  blocking the use of the Internet to companies that
                  send unsolicited bulk E-mail to Web surfers who
                  don't want to receive them.

                  "I would like some law I can enforce," he said. "I
                  don't consider myself an anti-spammer, just a
                  large backbone provider burdened with the task
                  of protecting the Internet."

                  Cyber Promotions President Sanford Wallace
                  could not be reached for comment.

                  Not addressed in the judge's ruling was Cyber
                  Promotions' contention that the First Amendment
                  guarantees its right to send all the E-mail it
                  wants.

                  "Under the law, it is improper to consider the
                  nature of the activities of Cyber," Brody wrote in
                  a footnote. "This includes my strong personal
                  distaste for Cyber's business."

                  Brody said the public interest "tips towards the
                  issuance of a preliminary injunction, although it is
                  undisputed that Cyber's business ... is a
                  controversial one.

                  "However, the fact that Cyber is an unpopular
                  citizen of the Internet does not mean that Cyber
                  is not entitled to have its contracts enforced in a
                  court of law or that Cyber is not entitled to such
                  injunctive relief as any similarly situated
                  business," Brody ruled.








Current thread: