nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUnet routes from hell..
From: brett watson <bwatson () genuity net>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 00:51:46 -0700
Uhm, yeah. It seems they decided that they wanted 128.0.0.0/9 or so, and decided that the easiest way to get it is announce it all as /24's. Spiffy. At least it was fixed relatively quickly.
the question remains, was this a bug in some version of their code? or could someone have actually mis-configured something this drastically? -brett
Current thread:
- UUnet routes from hell.. Harold Willison (Oct 07)
- Re: UUnet routes from hell.. Justin W. Newton (Oct 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UUnet routes from hell.. brett watson (Oct 08)