nanog mailing list archives
Re: why not peer with LS disabling networks ?
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () domino org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 15:59:10 +0000
On Mon, 24 Nov 1997 20:57:55 -0800 (PST) Network Operations Center <noc () nwrain net> wrote:
traceroute -g can be a surprisingly useful tool.And what traceroute are you using ?????? None of the BSD versions have it . JimL
/usr/home/neil:neil@NetBSD>traceroute -g
Version 1.4a5
Usage: traceroute [-dDFIlnrvx] [-g gateway] [-i iface] [-f first_ttl] [-m max_ttl]
[ -p port] [-q nqueries] [-s src_addr] [-t tos] [-w waittime]
host [packetlen]
--
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking. Domino: In the glow of the night.
neil () DOMINO ORG NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor)
Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/";>computer!</A>
Current thread:
- Re: Land and Cisco question, (continued)
- Re: Land and Cisco question Paul Ferguson (Nov 22)
- Re: Land and Cisco question Alan Barrett (Nov 23)
- Re: Land and Cisco question Joe Shaw (Nov 23)
- Re: Land and Cisco question Randy Bush (Nov 23)
- why not peer with LS disabling networks ? Lyndon Levesley (Nov 23)
- Re: why not peer with LS disabling networks ? John Hawkinson (Nov 23)
- Re: why not peer with LS disabling networks ? Randy Bush (Nov 23)
- Re: why not peer with LS disabling networks ? Paul Ferguson (Nov 24)
- Re: why not peer with LS disabling networks ? Network Operations Center (Nov 24)
- Re: why not peer with LS disabling networks ? John Hawkinson (Nov 24)
- Re: why not peer with LS disabling networks ? Neil J. McRae (Nov 25)
- Re: Land and Cisco question Dean Anderson (Nov 24)
- Re: Land and Cisco question Greg A. Woods (Nov 24)
- Re: Land and Cisco question Joe Shaw (Nov 24)