nanog mailing list archives
Re: new facility for nanog mailing list
From: "Richard Welty" <welty () wednesday inet-solutions net>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 14:57:13 +0000
What is your criteria for judging a message to be auto-flamed?
you didn't read the posting carefully enough. see the following: At 05:16 PM 11/12/97 +0000, Richard Welty wrote:
in light of the difficulty of determing appropriateness of postings to nanog, it appears that all postings to nanog will have to be "autoflamed".
cheers, richard -- Richard Welty Chief Internet Engineer, INet Solutions welty () inet-solutions net http://www.inet-solutions.net/~welty/ 888-311-INET
Current thread:
- new facility for nanog mailing list Richard Welty (Nov 12)
- Message not available
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 12)
- Message not available
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Christofer Hoff (Nov 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Danny McPherson (Nov 12)
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Paul G. Donner (Nov 13)
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Rik Schneider (Nov 13)
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Matthew D. Lammers (Nov 13)
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Richard Welty (Nov 13)