nanog mailing list archives
Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc
From: Michael McArthur <mcarthur () ans net>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 11:05:57 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 12 Nov 1997, Michael 'Moose' Dinn wrote:
Does anybody know if this affects the Cyrix and AMD "Pentium Clone" chips?It certainly affects the Cyrix - both P166+ and P200+. Don't know about the Cyrix MX and the AMD tho.--
That's the problem -- it isn't a "bug", just an exploitable instruction set that Cyrix, AMD, et al have been faithfully copying. For that matter, the 486 instruction set is a subset of the Pentium instruction set. Does this affect the 486/386 etc..?
Current thread:
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Michael McArthur (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Vijay Gill (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Bruce Robertson (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Leigh Porter (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Sharif Torpis (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Leigh Porter (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Greg A. Woods (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Vijay Gill (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Leo Seto (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug disc Greg A. Woods (Nov 12)