nanog mailing list archives
Re: moving to IPv6
From: Nikos Mouat <nikm () ixa net>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 12:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Hi, Perhaps I'm being rather naive, but one of the really cool things about the initial 6bone test address space was that the prefix was completely AS based.. theoretically if an adressing scheme was adopted that did not permit transferrible address space (think NAT) the entire backbone routing table could be simply composed of AS paths and relationship's between AS's. (if an addressing scheme based on AS or some kind of AS equivalent was adopted) Ofcourse AS's all of a sudden become a hot commodity.. but today, most routing policy is dictated based on AS more than by address space.. nm
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Evans (Nov 01)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 01)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David R. Conrad (Nov 01)
- moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Paul Ferguson (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Peter Galbavy (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Scott W Brim (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vijay Gill (Nov 01)
- moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Nikos Mouat (Nov 01)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Evans (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Joe Shaw (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Dorian R. Kim (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Brett Frankenberger (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jerry Scharf (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Pedro Marques (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)