nanog mailing list archives
Re: New MAE-EAST
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 00:58:57 -0500 (EST)
No, but losing ~20% throughput is OK, too.
Not to be rude or anything, but who is onecall? :-) Reid
We are a telco, specifically an IXC. We run an Exchange in Indiana. http://www.onecall.net/ http://www.indyx.net/ We, like Pac-Bell, and CHI, aren't having the same problems you are seeing at the FDDI exchanges.....
Current thread:
- Re: New MAE-EAST, (continued)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Richard Irving (Nov 05)
- Re: New MAE-EAST John (Nov 06)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Steven Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Nov 06)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Nathan Stratton (Nov 05)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Richard Irving (Nov 05)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Nathan Stratton (Nov 05)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Jeffrey C. Ollie (Nov 05)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Richard Irving (Nov 05)
- Message not available
- Re: New MAE-EAST Richard Irving (Nov 05)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Steve Sobol (Nov 05)
- Message not available
- Re: New MAE-EAST Alex Rubenstein (Nov 05)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Steven Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Nov 06)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Naiming Shen (Nov 05)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Paul D. Robertson (Nov 06)
- Re: New MAE-EAST John A. Tamplin (Nov 06)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Kent W. England (Nov 08)
- Message not available
- Re: New MAE-EAST Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 08)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Sean M. Doran (Nov 11)