nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10.0.0
From: Danny McPherson <danny () genuity net>
Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 01:10:02 -0700
You can have an internal mesh made up of entireley rfc1918 address space, and not leak these routes to the rest of the world, I've only once caught MCI leaking stuff from a test lab, which was kinda annoying, but not really anything bad, and a polite e-mail message to them got an immediate fix of the problem.
i'd think most providers filter rfc1918 addresses both inbound and outbound at naps (mci does, i believe), although maybe not to customers... using reserved address space internally (as long is it remains internal), seems like a good idea to me - isn't that why it was reserved? -danny - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- 10.0.0 Janet Pippin (May 30)
- Re: 10.0.0 Ehud Gavron (May 30)
- Re: 10.0.0 Jared Mauch (May 30)
- Re: 10.0.0 Paul Ferguson (May 31)
- Re: 10.0.0 Bil Herd (May 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 10.0.0 Dave O'Shea (May 30)
- Re: 10.0.0 Philip J. Nesser II (May 30)
- Re: 10.0.0 Alec H. Peterson (May 31)
- Re: 10.0.0 John Hawkinson (May 31)
- Re: 10.0.0 Philip J. Nesser II (May 30)
- Re: 10.0.0 Danny McPherson (May 31)
- Re: 10.0.0 Daniel Senie (May 31)
- Re: 10.0.0 Dave O'Shea (May 31)
- Re: 10.0.0 Tony Li (May 31)
- Re: 10.0.0 Ehud Gavron (May 30)