![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't
From: "David R. Conrad" <davidc () apnic net>
Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 00:50:26 +0900
Sigh.
I don't understand how you can deny that the IANA effort is a contracted function in the InterNIC contract and that ISI is in this function a contractor.
Please spend a bit of time figuring out what the IANA is, how long it has existed, and how much money NSI paid to support the IANA in the past. Hint: Fleming isn't a good source. But please don't do your research via NANOG. Thanks, -drc - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Richard J. Sexton (May 29)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Paul A Vixie (May 29)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Susan R. Harris (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Vince Wolodkin (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Perry E. Metzger (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Vince Wolodkin (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't David R. Conrad (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Dave Crocker (May 30)
- does the IANA exist Perry E. Metzger (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Paul A Vixie (May 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Sean M. Doran (May 30)