nanog mailing list archives
Re: Root Name Server Confederations
From: Ben Black <black () zen cypher net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 18:55:11 -0400 (EDT)
i guess i've said this about 900 times now. DNS is a coherent, distributed database. don't do anything that will make it less coherent. don't lets start back in on things that will make the same name mean something different (or become meaningless) depending on where you're standing when you resolve it.
actually, a name meaning something different depending on where you are when you resolve it actually can be a very good thing. just not in the context of multiple "." domains under independent control. b3n - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations, (continued)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Marc Hurst (May 21)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Dave Crocker (May 21)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Marc Hurst (May 21)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Perry E. Metzger (May 22)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Marc Hurst (May 22)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Dave Crocker (May 22)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Bradley E. Reynolds (May 22)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Ben Black (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Adrian J Bool (May 21)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Sean M. Doran (May 22)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Randy Bush (May 22)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Paul A Vixie (May 22)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Larry Vaden (May 22)
- flaming for dollars (Re: Root Name Server Confederations ) Paul A Vixie (May 22)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Marc Hurst (May 22)