nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSI and competition to RIPE and APNIC
From: Michael Dillon <michael () memra com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 09:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 12 May 1997, Stan Barber wrote:
Unfortunately, some who have expressed opinions have chosen not to be either thoughtful or constructive. I think some operators have been reluctant to participate because of this.
It's no surprise that the signal-to-noise ratio degrades when those who could supply some signal choose to let the noisemakers dominate the discussion. My theory is that by injecting more signal, you can improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Michael Dillon - Internet & ISP Consulting http://www.memra.com - E-mail: michael () memra com The bottom line is track record. Not track tearing. Not track derailing. But pounding the damn dirt around the track with the rest of us worms. -- Randy Bush - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: NSI and competition to RIPE and APNIC, (continued)
- Re: NSI and competition to RIPE and APNIC Randy Bush (May 11)
- Re: NSI and competition to RIPE and APNIC Kim Hubbard (May 11)
- Re: NSI and competition to RIPE and APNIC Ben Black (May 11)
- Re: NSI and competition to RIPE and APNIC Randy Bush (May 11)
- Re: NSI and competition to RIPE and APNIC Michael Dillon (May 11)
- Re: NSI and competition to RIPE and APNIC Michael Dillon (May 12)
- Re: NSI and competition to RIPE and APNIC Paul A Vixie (May 12)
- Re: NSI and competition to RIPE and APNIC Dennis Fazio (May 12)