nanog mailing list archives
Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing
From: "NetSurfer" <netsurf () pixi com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 06:27:48 -0000
Earlier I was chastised for stating unfounded rumor about fees of up to $20,000/year yet a similar fee structure for new registrations/services from ARIN is being proposed. Just wanted to point out that I wasn't referencing unfounded rumor but rather a reference that needed qualified i.e. allocation services for organizations requesting address space directly from ARIN. ---------- From: David R. Conrad <davidc () apnic net>
Proposed charging up to $20,000 for IP addresses - more unsubstantiated rumor?
Sigh. Would you *please* read the proposal (http://www.arin.net/arin_proposal.html, http://www.arin.net/arin_faq.html might also be helpful). If you had you would see that the fee is for allocation _services_ and only applicable to organizations requesting address space _directly_ from ARIN. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing John Curran (Mar 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing NetSurfer (Mar 30)
- Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing David R. Conrad (Mar 30)
- Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing Randy Bush (Mar 31)
- Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing NetSurfer (Mar 31)