nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss
From: Nathan Stratton <nathan () netrail net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 20:37:32 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 28 Mar 1997, Michael Dillon wrote:
electronic equipment. I know I have frequently solved problems with all sorts of equipment (computers, modems, terminal servers, routers) by dropping the ambient room temperature to below the level where it is comfortable for people to work, i.e. around 15 degrees. or by adding fans internally or externally.
We had a problem with this at the Atlanta-NAP, people were complaining that it was to cold. When we warmed it up a bit, we started having problems. So now we just tell them to dress warmly. :-) Nathan Stratton President, NetRail,Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phone (888)NetRail NetRail, Inc. Fax (404)522-1939 230 Peachtree Suite 500 WWW http://www.netrail.net/ Atlanta, GA 30303 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Matthew 6:34 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Alex.Bligh (Mar 28)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Darren Kerr (Mar 28)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Michael Dillon (Mar 28)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Nathan Stratton (Mar 28)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Michael Dillon (Mar 28)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Brian Horvitz (Mar 29)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Darren Kerr (Mar 28)