nanog mailing list archives
Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements
From: randy () psg com (Randy Bush)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 97 07:59 PST
M / \ A B * Peer link | * | Customer link RRRRRRR Point1 * * Point2 VVVVVVV I suppose that R should change their policy, so that all routes to M get treated as customer routes, even if non-customers appear in the path between R and M.
How is R supposed to recognize some likely disjoint set of of what A announces to R as coming from M through B so as to recognize it as a customer prefix? Note that the paths from M to R through A and B can be longer than depicted and that M's address space may not be taken from R's, A's, or B's. randy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements, (continued)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements John Scudder (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Vince Fuller (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Henry Kilmer (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements David Schwartz (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements the Riz (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Henry Kilmer (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Vince Fuller (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Henry Kilmer (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Vince Fuller (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements David Schwartz (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Alan Barrett (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Randy Bush (Mar 14)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Alan Barrett (Mar 14)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements John Scudder (Mar 14)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements David Schwartz (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements David Schwartz (Mar 14)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements John G. Scudder (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Jessica Yu (Mar 14)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Alex.Bligh (Mar 14)