nanog mailing list archives

Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements


From: randy () psg com (Randy Bush)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 97 07:59 PST

                    M
                  /   \
                 A     B      * Peer link
                 |     *      | Customer link
                 RRRRRRR
          Point1 *     * Point2
                 VVVVVVV

I suppose that R should change their policy, so that all routes to M get
treated as customer routes, even if non-customers appear in the path
between R and M.

How is R supposed to recognize some likely disjoint set of of what A
announces to R as coming from M through B so as to recognize it as a
customer prefix?  Note that the paths from M to R through A and B can
be longer than depicted and that M's address space may not be taken
from R's, A's, or B's.

randy
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: