nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Big Squeeze
From: Jim Jagielski <jim () jaguNET com>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 10:48:10 -0500 (EST)
Nathan Stratton wrote:
The internic is not out to get the small guys, and if you get larger they will give you space. You will just need to get your space from your transit provider and then if you get big, renumber.
It's the renumbering part that I think gives people the most heartburn... By the time you get "big enough" to warrent your own block, you've got at least 32 ClassCs of which, I'm betting, at least 28 are "given" to LAN-connected customers. This is a _major_ headache not only for the ISP to go thru but also a major headache to force your customers to go thru. That is, what I think, is what really is most painful; that by the time you are big enough to have your own block, you're too big to want to renumber: Catch 22 -- ==================================================================== Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services jim () jaguNET com | http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Not the Craw... the CRAW!" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- The Big Squeeze Scott Huddle (Mar 01)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Craig Nordin (Mar 01)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Nathan Stratton (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Jim Jagielski (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Nathan Stratton (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Pete Kruckenberg (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Jim Jagielski (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Avi Freedman (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Nathan Stratton (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Craig Nordin (Mar 01)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Michael Shields (Mar 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The Big Squeeze Scott Bradner (Mar 01)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Philip J. Nesser II (Mar 01)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Craig Nordin (Mar 01)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Philip J. Nesser II (Mar 01)