![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: 03/05/97 Internet Routing Problems
From: Pierre Thibaudeau <prt () Teleglobe CA>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 10:52:22 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 6 Mar 1997, Alex.Bligh wrote:
> This is a prinicpal example of why people should be filtering on > both inbound & outbound announcements of default & RFC1918 address > space. Well we do this (we also filter out some other things we don't want to hear from other people), but this set me thinking. Is there anyone who actually has a good reason to propogate default and reserved addresses through the RA? Wouldn't it be a good move for the RA itself to filter these announcements (in addition to what's in the policy)?
Alex, At least in theory, it is. Read paragraph titled "The Routing Arbiter's Responsibility" in <http://www.ra.net/RADB.tools.docs/radbserv.html>.
Alex Bligh Xara Networks
__ Pierre Thibaudeau | e-mail: <prt () Teleglobe CA> TELEGLOBE CANADA | 1000, rue de La Gauchetiere ouest | Tel: +1-514-868-7257 Montreal, QC H3B 4X5 | Canada | fax: +1-514-868-8446 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: 03/05/97 Internet Routing Problems Paul Ferguson (Mar 06)
- Re: 03/05/97 Internet Routing Problems Alex.Bligh (Mar 06)
- Re: 03/05/97 Internet Routing Problems Pierre Thibaudeau (Mar 06)
- Re: 03/05/97 Internet Routing Problems Craig Labovitz (Mar 06)
- Re: 03/05/97 Internet Routing Problems Dorn Hetzel (Mar 06)
- Re: 03/05/97 Internet Routing Problems Alex.Bligh (Mar 06)