nanog mailing list archives

Re: 03/05/97 Internet Routing Problems


From: Pierre Thibaudeau <prt () Teleglobe CA>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 10:52:22 -0500 (EST)

On Thu, 6 Mar 1997, Alex.Bligh wrote:

   > This is a prinicpal example of why people should be filtering on
   > both inbound & outbound announcements of default & RFC1918 address
   > space.
   
   Well we do this (we also filter out some other things we
   don't want to hear from other people), but this set me
   thinking. Is there anyone who actually has a good reason
   to propogate default and reserved addresses through the RA?
   Wouldn't it be a good move for the RA itself to filter
   these announcements (in addition to what's in the policy)?

Alex,

At least in theory, it is. Read paragraph titled "The Routing Arbiter's
Responsibility" in <http://www.ra.net/RADB.tools.docs/radbserv.html>.


   
   Alex Bligh
   Xara Networks
   
   
   
   
   
   

__

Pierre Thibaudeau                     |   e-mail: <prt () Teleglobe CA>
TELEGLOBE CANADA                      |
1000, rue de La Gauchetiere ouest     |      Tel: +1-514-868-7257
Montreal, QC   H3B 4X5                |
Canada                                |      fax: +1-514-868-8446

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: