nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP ... New Information
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 11:57:31 -0400
At 10:38 AM 06/11/97 -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
One way is to divide the IP space up into value tiers and bid for it. I'm sure NSI would be more than willing to do this :)
Oh, no. Not this thread again. Somehow I get the feeling that the signal/noise ratio is about to taka a nosedive again. This issues has been hashed, and re-hashed, to death on various mailing lists, to include NANOG. I would suggest that if this is an issue that you wish to discuss/pursue, please take it to the PIARA mailing list: piara-request () apnic net - paul
Current thread:
- Re: NSP ... New Information, (continued)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Bill Sommerfeld (Jun 09)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 09)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Karl Denninger (Jun 09)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Jim Fleming (Jun 09)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Stan Barber (Jun 09)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Jim Fleming (Jun 09)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Eric Germann (Jun 10)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Eric Kozowski (Jun 10)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Phil Howard (Jun 10)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Phil Howard (Jun 11)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Paul Ferguson (Jun 11)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Michael Shields (Jun 11)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Rodney Joffe (Jun 11)