Re: Ascend GRF

[Daniel Senie <dts () openroute com>]

PSI used to feed our site with a Cisco 7xxx and changed to a GRF400. The
OpenROUTE Networks RBX250 router we use to talk to it had no problems with
either. Actual packet throughput appears to be improved since the router
was swapped, which I assume was the reason for the replacement. I haven't
noticed a substantial difference in the speed with which the advertisements
roll in. Either upstream box pumped out the BGP advertisements when the
line first comes up at about 60% of the T1. Neither box pushes harder than
that.

There were some problems (non-BGP) when PSI first tried to activate the
GRF, but those appear to have been resolved.

At 07:58 AM 6/11/97 -0500, Peter Leppik wrote:
> I've been hearing conflicting stories about the Ascend GRF lately.
> Cisco claims that it doesn't really work as advertised in "realistic
> networks," but Ascend says this is because Cisco's routers melt down
> when the GRF feeds them routing table updates, so the GRF has to be
> throttled back to work in a mixed environment.
>
> Does anybody have any real experience here?  Any information, pointers,
> anecdotes, or wild rumors would help.
>
> Thanks,
>   -Peter

Daniel Senie                           mailto:dts () openroute com
Sr. Staff Engineer                     http://www.openroute.com/
OpenROUTE Networks, Inc.               (a wholly owned subsidiary of
Proteon, Inc.)