nanog mailing list archives
Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION)
From: Karl Denninger <karl () Mcs Net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 09:13:08 -0500
On Wed, Jul 23, 1997 at 09:53:42AM -0400, Eric Germann wrote:
would an anti-kashpureff bgp feed fix the dns pollution problems similar to the anti spam black list. If yes, is it collusion which would be prosecutable? If no, what are the TECHNICAL reasons it wouldn't work. Eric
No, because *ANY* nameserver which gets the pollution can then pollute you. Since you can't cut off EVERY nameserver with such a feed, it is pointless to attempt it. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl () MCS Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity http://www.mcs.net/~karl | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service | 99 Analog numbers, 77 ISDN, http://www.mcs.net/ Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| NOW Serving 56kbps DIGITAL on our analog lines! Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | 2 FULL DS-3 Internet links; 400Mbps B/W Internal
Current thread:
- Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Eric Germann (Jul 23)
- Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Karl Denninger (Jul 23)
- Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Jared Mauch (Jul 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Eric Germann (Jul 23)
- Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Jon Lewis (Jul 23)
- Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Karl Denninger (Jul 23)