nanog mailing list archives
Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption
From: Systems Engineer <snash () lightning net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 14:56:19 -0400
To respond to your upgrade to bind-4.9.6 or 8.1.1, I would go with 4.9.6 because I know of many bugs left in 8.1.1 that can harm a Name Server. When I get more information on this, I will release it to the list. One of the many bugs in it involves CNAME. I will talk to the person who released this information to me and get back to the list.
3a) What measures were taken (other than discussion of DNSSEC, orlack ofit) to 'cure' affected servers?upgrade to bind-4.9.6 or bind-8.1.1.
-- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Steven Nash ph: (516)248-8400ext25 Systems Engineer / Network Security fax: (516)248-8897 Lightning Internet Services LLC email: snash () lightning net http://www.lightning.net --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Current thread:
- Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption, (continued)
- Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption Paul A Vixie (Jul 29)
- Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption Paul Ferguson (Jul 29)
- Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption Thomas H. Ptacek (Jul 29)
- Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption Paul A Vixie (Jul 29)
- Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 30)
- Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption Randy Bush (Jul 29)
- Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption Systems Engineer (Jul 30)
- Message not available
- Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 30)
- Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption Michael Dillon (Jul 30)
- Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption Alexander O. Yuriev (Jul 31)