nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability
From: salo () msc edu (Tim Salo)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 15:17:57 -0600 (CST)
Entirely agreed. On the other hand I have what is turning out to be a unique (here) point of view about this. I don't want to prevent this kind of theft -- I want to discover it, and remove perpetrators from any IXP where they try it. I don't want to block it. I want to ensure that it is never tried twice. I appear to be in the minority wrt this view. This sounds like a line of reasoning that would argue against filtering in routers: "I don't want to prevent [this activity, whatever it might be] -- I want to discover it..." What sort of filters do you put in your routers? -tjs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability, (continued)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Paul A Vixie (Jan 31)
- RE: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Chris A. Icide (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Paul A Vixie (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability George Phillips (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability David S. Holub (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Tony Li (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Brett L. Hawn (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Joseph T. Klein (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Paul A Vixie (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Vince Fuller (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Tim Salo (Jan 31)