nanog mailing list archives
Re: peering charges?
From: Edward Henigin <ed () texas net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 17:22:32 -0600 (CST)
From what I know, routers (ciscos at least) tend to be packet-limited rather than bandwidth limited.. Isn't it a good enough first approximation to count packets rather than sum packet sizes? Ed -- On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Dirk Harms-Merbitz wrote:
The packets are of different size. We have been using the phrase "counting packets" in the sense of "counting the bytes in packets". Dirk
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- RE: peering charges?, (continued)
- RE: peering charges? Mike Leber (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Sean Donelan (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Pushpendra Mohta (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Pushpendra Mohta (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Mike Leber (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Pushpendra Mohta (Jan 27)
- RE: peering charges? Vadim Antonov (Jan 27)
- RE: peering charges? Michael Dillon (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Vadim Antonov (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Alex.Bligh (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Edward Henigin (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Alex.Bligh (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Deepak Jain (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Michael Dillon (Jan 27)