nanog mailing list archives
Re: peering charges?
From: Jun (John) Wu <jun () wolfox gsl net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 14:50:36 -0500 (EST)
===== Jeff Young previously wrote: ====
if internetMCI decides that we should or should not peer with another network the decision is made purely on traffic flows. if coast to coast traffic moves over our network twice between ourselves and the peer, that's not a peer. if the peer has a number of nap connections and a ds3 ld packet network, that's a peer.
Definitely 100% agree. Now think further, a global network with local peers all over the place... hmm... how much international bandwidth that might cost?
the practice that you refer to as 'unwise' keeps us from losing our shirts in an already-too-competitive marketplace.
Underware as well if you think globally. Jun -- Jun (John) Wu | Voice: (703)689-5325 Supervisor - Global IP Systems & Services | Fax: (703)478-7852 Global One Communications L.L.C. | Email: jun () gsl net Reston, VA 20196 | URL: http://wolfox.gsl.net/jun - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: peering charges?, (continued)
- Re: peering charges? Jonathan Heiliger (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Nathan Stratton (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Avi Freedman (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Alec H. Peterson (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Paul A Vixie (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Pushpendra Mohta (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Nathan Stratton (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Jonathan Heiliger (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Paul A Vixie (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Jeff Young (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? John (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Paul A Vixie (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Jon Zeeff (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Paul A Vixie (Jan 27)