![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: peering charges?
From: "J. Malcolm" <jmalcolm () uraeus com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 00:50:24 -0500
Dirk Harms-Merbitz writes:
Why should it cost more to connect at 100MB/sec vs. 56KB/sec? If the same amount of packets are transfered? Why should I pay more beyond the one-time cost of buying interface electronics?
Because what costs money is engineering for peak usage. If you can send traffic at 100MB/sec instead of 56KB/sec your peak usage can (and likely will) be much higher. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: peering charges?, (continued)
- Re: peering charges? Jim McManus (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Jonathan Heiliger (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Todd Graham Lewis (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Daryn D. Fisher (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Michael Dillon (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Jonathan Heiliger (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Jim McManus (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? J. Malcolm (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Craig Nordin (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Alex.Bligh (Jan 27)
- RE: peering charges? Mike Leber (Jan 27)