nanog mailing list archives
Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting
From: "Philip J. Nesser II" <pjnesser () martigny ai mit edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 14:29:23 -0500 (EST)
Sean Donelan supposedly said:
Personally, I would be happy if the IETF-RUN group put out a document on the right and wrong way to complain. Spamming your complaint about spam is a bit hippocritical. --
During the last WG meeting when we decided to take up the spamming issue the comment was made: "Well, once we finish the document we should make sure to send a copy to everyone on the Internet to make sure they know that they shouldn't SPAM." ---> Phil - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Mike Leber (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting David Schwartz (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Howard C. Berkowitz (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Philip J. Nesser II (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Paul A Vixie (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Philip J. Nesser II (Jan 21)