nanog mailing list archives
Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses
From: Tony Li <tli () jnx com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 01:42:35 -0800 (PST)
Isn't it unsurpsrising that >40% of packets are small? ACKs? If one made the gross oversimplifying approximation that everything is unidirectional TCP traffic, then you'd expect to see one ACK per two data packets. Thus, we'd expect to see 33% at 40 bytes. It is the additional 7+% that's surprising. Tony - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Questions about Internet Packet Losses Bob Metcalfe (Jan 13)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Tony Li (Jan 13)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Craig Labovitz (Jan 13)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses John W. Stewart III (Jan 13)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Bakul Shah (Jan 13)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Alex.Bligh (Jan 14)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Tony Li (Jan 14)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Paul A Vixie (Jan 14)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Michael Dillon (Jan 14)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Paul A Vixie (Jan 14)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Tony Li (Jan 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Vadim Antonov (Jan 13)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Tony Li (Jan 13)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Michael Dillon (Jan 13)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Vadim Antonov (Jan 13)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Vern Paxson (Jan 13)