nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic registries
From: William Sommers <sommers () sfo com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 97 18:28:08 PST
On Sat, 11 Jan 1997 20:23:37 -0500 (EST) Mark Kosters wrote:
I see this and have noticed in the change logs that the whois dumper program was recently updated. I've backed out the change and the old info will return by 6:00AM or so tomorrow. (Ingres database looks ok but obviously whois is not). Thanks, Mark
Were I InterNIC management, I'd be wondering why it took an employee perusing an off-topic thread in this list to have the problem brought to somebody's attention. I reported it to action () internic net yesterday morning, at which time it had already been going on for at least a day. Then again, since I've long been convinced my mail to InterNIC is just plain blackholed anyway (based on a response rate of exactly 0% to date), I don't know why I thought that one would have been treated any differently. (Sorry, couldn't resist.) :-) William Sommers San Francisco Online Televolve, Inc. sommers () sfo com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Internic registries jordy (Jan 11)
- Re: Internic registries Dave Pokorney (Jan 11)
- Re: Internic registries Matthew Petach (Jan 11)
- Re: Internic registries Timothy Brown (Jan 11)
- Re: Internic registries Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Jan 11)
- Re: Internic registries Bradley E. Reynolds (Jan 11)
- Re: Internic registries Mark Kosters (Jan 11)
- Re: Internic registries Dave Crocker (Jan 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Internic registries Rodney Joffe (Jan 11)
- Re: Internic registries Brian Pettingell (Jan 11)
- Re: Internic registries William Sommers (Jan 11)