![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor
From: "Charles F. Crizer Jr." <ccrizer () dyncon net>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 12:46:19 -0500 (EST)
I knew this went to the FCC before and was shot down. The FCC was not too impressed with the phone companies claim that the load was "too high". Plus the Whitehouse doesn't want to put too many tolls on the "information superhighway". I'll look into it and see what is going on. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles F. Crizer Jr. KF4MNE Senior Systems Engineer ccrizer () dyncon net Certified Novell Administrator http://www.cais.com/dyncon -------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright 1997 Charles F. Crizer Jr. All Rights Reserved. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Unsubstantiated Rumor James R. Fisher (Feb 09)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor Charles F. Crizer Jr. (Feb 09)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor Randy Bush (Feb 09)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor Michael Dillon (Feb 13)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor Randy Bush (Feb 09)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor Hong Chen (Feb 09)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor Simona Nass (Feb 17)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor Hong Chen (Feb 17)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor - this is not simply about RBOC ISP Tariff David Holub (Feb 17)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor Michael Dillon (Feb 17)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor Simona Nass (Feb 17)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor Charles F. Crizer Jr. (Feb 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor James R. Fisher (Feb 09)