nanog mailing list archives
Re: root server update
From: NSSI_2@nssi_2.frontier.com
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 13:12:39 -0400
The root name servers each take between 500 and 1000 queries per second. So testing them from time to time isn't going to hurt much. However, we don't need to test them from very many places, since we would just overload the trouble reporting system, which tends to be biologically limited. How about if each root name server just implements RFC 2010 and does their own monitoring, and InterNIC does the fallback monitoring, and we stop arguing about global issues on a north american mailing list? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: root server update, (continued)
- Re: root server update Craig Nordin (Feb 14)
- Re: root server update Paul A Vixie (Feb 14)
- Re: root server update Craig Nordin (Feb 14)
- Re: root server update Qarin Van Brink (Feb 14)
- Re: root server update Qarin Van Brink (Feb 14)
- Re: root server update Randy Bush (Feb 14)
- Re: root server update Matthew Kaufman (Feb 14)
- Re: root server update Michael Dillon (Feb 14)
- Re: root server update NSSI_2 (Feb 19)
- Re: root server update NSSI_2 (Feb 19)
- Re: root server update NSSI_2 (Feb 19)
- Re: root server update NSSI_2 (Feb 19)